Away from 14 inquiries off cervical cancer examination, feminine whose score have been ? ten was indeed randomly categorized as the which have ‘a good knowledge’ or else was considered as with “not good education”. To possess experience with HPV, feminine whose respond to is ‘never been aware of HPV’ have been excluded from the analysis off HPV studies.
Of 5 inquiries, feminine whoever get had been ? 3 was indeed regarded as having ‘a expertise in HPV’ if not as ‘not good knowledge’. Off 19 concerns, women whose score was ? 13 have been classified because the that have ‘an effective total knowledge’ if not due to the fact ‘not-good total knowledge’.
The analysis have been gathered when you look at the an electronic databases and you can examined having fun with SPSS V.twenty-six.0 (SPSS, Inc., il, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic data and you can have been summarized due to the fact numbers that have fee, mean which have important departure otherwise median having assortment. The fresh new association anywhere between for each adjustable and you may degree get was indeed assessed using simple linear regression. Exploratory design was developed inside multivariable data also most of the parameters possibly associated with the details get. Brand new thought quantity of analytical importance is a beneficial p-worth of 0.05 or faster.
Out of 500 women that came across addition criteria and you will was basically allowed on analysis, one to ong 499 women that taken care of immediately the new survey from the education out of cervical malignant tumors and you may evaluating (part II) and you will information gorgeousbrides.net beskrivelse about HPV (area II), several failed to bring personal information. So market data was in fact found in only 497 female (Table step 1). The mean age 497 players was many years (SD ± ). Over fifty percent of one’s professionals had been aged Desk step one. Socio-economic feature (N = 497).
The newest symptoms to own colposcopy had been abnormal cervical cytology which have presence out-of HR-HPV (155; 29.2%), abnormal cytology that have negative otherwise not familiar away from Time-Horsepower (274; 55.1%), exposure from just Hour-HPV (65; thirteen.1%), or only reputation of CIN (3; 0.6%) (Dining table 2).
Centered on per concern on cervical cancer tests (Desk step three), 95.4% of 499 feminine misunderstood that most feminine are processed to own cervical cancers (Q step 1). Around 55% to 70% knew when you should initiate and you may regularity from examination (Q dos–4). Yet not, only 17.4% and you may thirty six.3%was in fact conscious the examination wasn’t requisite further–immediately after hysterectomy for low-cervical disease (Q 5) or shortly after 65 years with reputation for consecutively normal earlier investigations (Q 6).
Into the ways of evaluation (Q seven–14), 79% regarding players had been aware that there are many evaluating steps (Q eight). not, only eight.2% had knowledge one to cervical screening will be done during the time out-of pelvic test (Q 8). The participants have been familiar with cervical cytologic investigations (Q 10; 93.8%), HPV research (Q 11; 89.2%), co-comparison (Q several; 92.4%) but not having artwork review immediately following acetic acid (VIA) which had been understood in only 31.7% (Q 9). In addition, 57.7% and you will 65.3% off members got misconception one to cervical cancers examination was over of the imaging (Q 13) and bloodstream sample to own cyst indicators (Q fourteen), respectively.
Getting experience with HPV, 110 users (20.0%) got never ever heard of HPV. One of many remaining 389 professionals, bulk (ninety five.5%) knew one HPV infection is avoidable and you can 85.1% was in fact conscious it’s avoidable by vaccination. Whether or not most (ninety.5%) realized you to definitely cervical cancers comes from oncogenic HPV, just approximately half knew that it can be prevented by steering clear of sexual passion otherwise venereal wart comes from low-oncogenic HPV.
I assessed knowledge of the players from the get (Desk 4). The fresh new imply scores of users for expertise in cervical malignant tumors examination (N = 499) as well as HPV (N = 389) was indeed ± 2.37 (away from 14 inquiries) and you will step three.53 ± 1.11 (away from 5 questions), respectively. Because of the categorization, 26.9% and 20.1% had an effective knowledge of cervical cancer tumors evaluating and HPV respectively. New indicate sum get of knowledge regarding the cervical cancers assessment and you may HPV was basically ± dos.87 (off 19 issues), with only 25.2% got a great complete education.